🔗 Share this article

This revolution isn't televised, but it could have webbed feet and large eyes.

It also might feature the horn of a unicorn or the plumage of a chicken.

While demonstrations against the government carry on in US cities, protesters have embraced the spirit of a neighborhood dress-up party. They've provided salsa lessons, distributed treats, and performed on unicycles, as armed law enforcement look on.

Mixing levity and politics – an approach experts term "tactical frivolity" – has historical precedent. However, it has emerged as a defining feature of protests in the United States in this period, used by various groups.

A specific icon has emerged as notably significant – the frog. It began after recordings of an encounter between an individual in an amphibian costume and immigration enforcement agents in the city of Portland, became an internet sensation. It subsequently appeared to demonstrations throughout the United States.

"There's a lot happening with that little blow-up amphibian," states a professor, a professor at University of California, Davis and an academic who specialises in creative activism.

The Path From the Pepe Meme to Portland

It is difficult to talk about demonstrations and amphibians without mentioning Pepe, an illustrated figure co-opted by far-right groups throughout a previous presidential campaign.

As the meme first took off on the internet, its purpose was to signal certain emotions. Subsequently, its use evolved to endorse a political figure, including one notable meme shared by the candidate himself, showing the frog with a signature suit and hair.

Pepe was also depicted in digital spaces in more extreme scenarios, as a hate group member. Users exchanged "rare Pepes" and established cryptocurrency using its likeness. His catchphrase, "feels good, man", was used an inside joke.

However Pepe didn't start out this divisive.

The artist behind it, artist Matt Furie, has expressed about his unhappiness for how the image has been used. Pepe was supposed to be simply a relaxed amphibian in his series.

The frog first appeared in a series of comics in the mid-2000s – non-political and famous for a particular bathroom habit. In a documentary, which documents the creator's attempt to wrest back control of his creation, he explained his drawing came from his time with friends and roommates.

When he began, Mr Furie experimented with sharing his art to new websites, where the community began to copy, alter, and reinterpret the frog. As Pepe spread into darker parts of the internet, Mr Furie sought to reject the frog, including ending its life in a comic strip.

However, its legacy continued.

"It proves that we don't control imagery," says Prof Bogad. "They transform and be reworked."

Until recently, the association of this meme resulted in frogs were predominantly linked to the right. But that changed on a day in October, when a viral moment between a protestor wearing a blow-up amphibian suit and a federal agent in Portland went viral.

The moment followed an order to deploy the National Guard to Portland, which was described as "a warzone". Activists began to congregate outside a facility, near an ICE office.

The situation was tense and an agent deployed pepper spray at the individual, directing it into the ventilation of the costume.

The individual, Seth Todd, reacted humorously, stating he had tasted "something milder". However, the video went viral.

The costume fit right in for the city, renowned for its eccentric vibe and activist demonstrations that embrace the ridiculous – public yoga, retro fitness classes, and nude cycling groups. The city's unofficial motto is "Embrace the Strange."

The frog was also referenced in the ensuing legal battle between the administration and the city, which claimed the use of troops was unlawful.

While a ruling was issued that month that the president had the right to send personnel, a dissenting judge wrote, referencing in her ruling demonstrators' "well-known penchant for donning inflatable costumes while voicing their disagreement."

"Some might view this decision, which accepts the government's characterization as a war zone, as merely absurd," Judge Susan Graber opined. "However, this ruling has serious implications."

The action was halted by courts soon after, and troops withdrew from the area.

Yet already, the amphibian costume had transformed into a potent protest icon for progressive movements.

The costume appeared across the country at No Kings protests last autumn. Frogs appeared – along with other creatures – in San Diego and Atlanta and Boston. They were in rural communities and big international cities like Tokyo and London.

The frog costume was sold out on major websites, and became more expensive.

Mastering the Narrative

What connects the two amphibian symbols – is the dynamic between the humorous, benign cartoon and underlying political significance. This concept is "tactical frivolity."

This approach rests on what Mr Bogad terms a "disarming display" – frequently absurd, it's a "appealing and non-threatening" act that calls attention to your ideas without needing explicitly stating them. It's the silly outfit used, or the meme you share.

Mr Bogad is an analyst on this topic and someone who uses these tactics. He's written a book called 'Tactical Performance', and led seminars around the world.

"One can look back to the Middle Ages – under oppressive regimes, they use absurdity to express dissent indirectly and still have a layer of protection."

The purpose of such tactics is multi-faceted, he explains.

As activists take on authority, a silly costume {takes control of|seizes|influences