🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where Black people are remunerated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The month has evolved since those days, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the month is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to erase African American heritage and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.